October 19, 2021


News Network

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken Remarks at a Service of Remembrance for George Pratt Shultz

19 min read

Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

Stanford, California

Stanford Memorial Church

(As Prepared)

Charlotte and members of the Shultz family: thank you for the honor of joining this celebration of the life of George Shultz.

To all our hosts: Stanford University, the Hoover Institute, the Stanford Memorial Church, and Bishop Swing, thank you for letting us hail the Secretary in a place that meant so much to him.

Secretary Rice, Senator Nunn, Secretary Baker, General Mattis, Secretary Kissinger: I am confident that I’ll never again have to endure the dread of speaking last in such a remarkable – and remarkably eloquent – group of public servants.

I’m humbled to be the current occupant of the office – or, better said, one of the offices – that George Shultz held.

Unlike others here today, I never had the privilege of working with Secretary Shultz. But I live in a world – and work at a State Department – that he shaped.

Whether it’s taking part in a meeting of the G7, which he helped create; swearing in new diplomats at the Shultz National Foreign Affairs Training Center, which he did more than anyone to build; or simply living in a post-Cold War world, which he helped bring about – the legacy of George Shultz is all around, every day that I serve as Secretary of State.

I’d like to focus on one powerful part of his legacy: what Secretary Shultz meant to our nation’s career diplomats.

Because as I see it, I’m here today as their representative.

As many of you know, every Secretary is assigned a few junior career officers as Special Assistants, or “Specials.” They do a lot of scutwork – printing out briefing papers, assembling the Secretary’s daily book, and feeding his or her responses back out to bureaus.

Secretary Shultz saw his Specials, and all junior career officers, as people he could mentor and mold – America’s future Assistant Secretaries and Ambassadors. And indeed, many of them went onto hold those posts.

One former Special, Ambassador Maura Harty, remembered being invited into the Secretary’s office during her first week on the job to listen in on a meeting with a member of Congress. As they discussed a contentious point, Secretary Shultz said, “Congressman, I know this is right, because a foreign service officer wrote it.”

After the meeting, he asked Maura what she thought. She said she’d never forget what he said. The Secretary took a beat, smiled, and asked, “Why do you think I brought you in here?”

If he was going to discuss a memo, he always wanted the staffer who had written it to be in the room – no matter his or her rank. He thought they’d know things that their higher-ups did not.

He went out of his way to show the building he recognized their hard work, all the way down to the thank you notes to local staff that he insisted on signing before he left a foreign country, so they could be handed over the moment he was wheels up. A Special would run down the steps of his plane, thank-you notes in hand, just before departure.

He dropped in on teams to thank them after demanding stretches and hosted farewell lunches for retiring diplomats. It wasn’t uncommon for Specials who accompanied him to Palo Alto for the holidays to find themselves at the Shultz’s table for dinner.

Even for people who had spent years in the Department, these were firsts.

Tom Simons was a senior career official in SOV, the now obsolete Soviet Desk, when Shultz came on as Secretary. A few months later, the Soviet desk threw a big holiday party, which Tom spruced up with some caviar he’d brought back from Moscow after attending the Brezhnev funeral. They had plenty of vodka too.

Well, Secretary Shultz decided to swing by. He praised the team’s work, shook everyone’s hand, and then just… hung out, chatting with people. Tom had been a foreign service officer for nine years before he’d even met a Secretary – and then it had happened only in a staffing capacity, not at a party.

“The difference,” Tom said, “was that George Shultz came to us.”

And because he believed in our diplomats, he also made endless trips to the Hill to lobby Congress for the resources he felt the Department deserved. Ever the economist, he always toted along posterboards packed with charts and graphs demonstrating how much we were getting in return for our modest investment in diplomacy. When statistics proved unpersuasive, he once pulled a baby’s onesie from his briefcase that read, “Someone in the State Department loves me.” He held it up to his broad chest and said, “Ladies and gentlemen, what you’ve given me is too small.”

When he engaged with the women and men of the State Department, he listened to them and trusted them. And trust, as many have noted, was the coin of the realm for him.

He once brought James Goodby, a career diplomat and then-arms control expert, to brief President Reagan in the Oval Office, and made a point of putting Jim – and not himself – in the chair next to the President. Jim never forgot the gesture, he later told a historian.

In 1986, Secretary Shultz led a delegation of U.S. diplomats – including the great Paul Nitze – to Reykjavik for a two-day summit with the Soviets on nuclear disarmament.

The working-level negotiations went late into the first night. Around two in the morning, Paul met the Secretary to walk through the sticking points. After they had talked them through, Shultz said to Paul: “It’s your meeting and you’re the boss. You are in control.”

Paul had surely heard that many times before – but I’m not sure how often he heard it from a sitting Secretary of State. Even at this, arguably the most important discussion yet with the Soviets on nuclear disarmament, Secretary Shultz knew that the best move was to trust his team.

Of course, he understood that the Department was not always the sum of its parts – that his job was to see the full field and make State function as a team. And he understood that there were key decisions that only he could make, and a vision that only the President and he could provide.

In foreign policy, people’s strength often lies either in defining the strategy or executing it. Thinkers or doers. Secretary Shultz was gifted at both. He had a vision for the world he wanted to see…and he knew how to turn it into reality.

And he knew how to get the most out of the foreign service. He saw the career diplomats as they saw themselves: dedicated, nonpartisan experts who could be marshaled to advance America’s interests and values in the world – and ultimately make the world a better place.

As much as anything else he brought to the role – and he brought a great deal – this is what made him a great Secretary of State.

Many of you know the story of Secretary Shultz and the giant globe in his office. Every time a new ambassador was named, before he or she flew off to their new post, the Secretary would invite them into his office and ask them to pass one final test: to find their country on a giant globe. They’d spin it around looking for Ethiopia or Chile or Thailand. Then the Secretary would gently move their finger and point it to the United States. “This is your country.”

What strikes me about this story is not only the deep and abiding love that George Shultz felt for the United States, which he never, ever forgot was his country – but also how his model of leadership kindly but firmly made the people around him better.

He was a teacher. And many of us here today, in one way or another, were his students. Still are.

There are a number of Secretaries of State here today. We few are lucky to occupy that extraordinary role. We do our best to do the most good we can in the short time we have – in the face of huge challenges and an ever-complex world – before passing the baton onto the next person.

Every one of us who followed George Shultz – Democrat and Republican; those who are here today, and those who are not – had an advantage that he did not have: We got to learn from him – from the example he provided, the bar he set. He made the State Department better – and he has made us better, too.

Thank you, Mr. Secretary.

More from: Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State

News Network

  • The United States Targets Foundations Controlled by Iran’s Supreme Leader
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
  • Man Sentenced for Covid-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
    In Crime News
    A Washington State man was sentenced today to two years in prison for perpetrating a scheme to fraudulently obtain COVID-19 disaster relief loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (SBA) through the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) and the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act.
    [Read More…]
  • National Health Care Fraud Enforcement Action Results in Charges Involving over $1.4 Billion in Alleged Losses
    In Crime News
    The Department of Justice announced today criminal charges against 138 defendants, including 42 doctors, nurses, and other licensed medical professionals, in 31 federal districts across the United States for their alleged participation in various health care fraud schemes that resulted in approximately $1.4 billion in alleged losses.
    [Read More…]
  • Statement Of AAG Makan Delrahim Thanking Participants In Workshop On Competition In The Licensing Of Public Performance Rights In The Music Industry
    In Crime News
    On Wednesday July 29, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division concluded its two-day virtual workshop on competition in the licensing of public performance rights in the music industry.
    [Read More…]
  • Cuba Travel Advisory
    In Travel
    Do not travel to Cuba [Read More…]
  • Guyana National Day
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Man from the Congo found guilty in smuggling attempt
    In Justice News
    A federal jury has [Read More…]
  • Connecticut Man Charged with Assaulting an Officer During U.S. Capitol Breach
    In Crime News
    A Connecticut man was charged yesterday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia with assaulting an officer during the breach of the U.S. Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021. He will be presented in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York today, before appearing in Washington D.C. 
    [Read More…]
  • Pharmacy Owner Pleads Guilty to $6.5 million Health Care Fraud Schemes
    In Crime News
    A New York woman pleaded guilty today to perpetrating schemes to defraud health care programs, including obtaining more than $6.5 million from Medicare Part D Plans and Medicaid drug plans.
    [Read More…]
  • County Medical Center and County Agree to Pay $11.4 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations Relating to Medically Unnecessary Inpatient Admissions
    In Crime News
    San Mateo County Medical Center and San Mateo County (collectively SMMC), located in California, have agreed to pay approximately  $11.4 million to resolve alleged violations of the False Claims Act for submitting or causing the submission of claims to Medicare for non-covered inpatient admissions.
    [Read More…]
  • Five Charged in Scheme to Export Thermal Imaging Scopes and Night Vision Goggles to Russia, in Violation of Arms Export Control Act
    In Crime News
    A federal grand jury in Los Angeles unsealed an indictment Thursday that accuses five defendants of conspiring to unlawfully export defense articles to Russia. Specifically, the defendants allegedly exported thermal imaging riflescopes and night-vision goggles without a license, in violation of the Arms Export Control Act.
    [Read More…]
  • Former Owner of Michigan Home Health Care Business Sentenced to Prison for Tax Fraud
    In Crime News
    A Michigan man was sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison today for filing a false tax return.
    [Read More…]
  • Former Construction Company Owner Indicted for Defrauding Federal Program Intended for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses
    In Crime News
    Today, a federal grand jury in San Antonio, Texas, returned an indictment charging the former owner of several companies in the construction industry for his role in a long-running scheme to defraud the United States.
    [Read More…]
  • Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan and Iraq
    In U.S GAO News
    U.S.-led Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRT) are designed to help improve stability in Afghanistan and Iraq by increasing the host nation's capacity to govern; enhancing economic viability; and strengthening local governments' ability to deliver public services, such as security and health care. PRTs are a means of coordinating interagency diplomatic, economic, reconstruction, and counterinsurgency efforts among various U.S. agencies in Afghanistan and Iraq. PRTs are intended to be interim structures; after a PRT has achieved its goal of improving stability, it may be dismantled to allow traditional development efforts to occur. In Afghanistan, the first PRTs were created in 2002 with the mission of facilitating security and reconstruction by helping the central government extend its authority to the provinces. Since then, PRTs have expanded their purpose to include strengthening local governance and community development. In Iraq, PRTs were initiated in 2005 with the mission to increase the capacity of provincial and local governments to govern effectively and, for newer embedded PRTs (ePRT), to support moderates and assist in the military's counterinsurgency efforts. To accomplish their missions, PRTs engage in and fund a variety of activities, such as developing the capacity of local governments through engagement with local stakeholders; promoting budget execution, business development, agriculture, public health initiatives, and governance; and supporting the delivery of basic social services. This report describes (1) the organization, staffing, and funding for PRTs in Afghanistan and (2) the organization, staffing, and funding for PRTs in Iraq. It excludes information marked "Sensitive but Unclassified" in our September 26, 2008, report on PRTs. Due to broad congressional interest in issues related to Iraq and Afghanistan, we completed this report under the Comptroller General's authority to conduct evaluations on his own initiative.Afghanistan, as of May 2008, the United States was leading 12 of 26 PRTs and 13 other coalition countries were leading the remaining 14 PRTs. All PRTs in Afghanistan are under ISAF's operational command, but individual nations, including the United States, lead PRTs and determine their size and structure. U.S.-led PRTs in Afghanistan are led by DOD and are composed primarily of U.S. military personnel. As of April 2008, 10 of the 12 U.S.-led PRTs included 88 or more military personnel--the majority of whom provide security and other support for the PRTs--and 3 civilian personnel from State, USAID, and USDA. The total number of U.S. government personnel assigned to U.S. PRTs in Afghanistan increased slightly from 1,023 personnel in 2007 to 1,055 personnel in 2008--which includes 1,021 military personnel from DOD and 34 civilian personnel from State, USAID, and USDA. DOD is responsible for paying nearly all of the costs associated with operating PRTs, such as providing their security and life support. However, DOD officials reported that DOD does not track PRT operating costs separately from other operational costs for Afghanistan. State, USAID, and USDA do not reimburse DOD for its support to civilian PRT officials in Afghanistan. PRTs have one source of programmatic funding available for projects in Afghanistan. PRT commanders can approve the use of funds for projects under DOD's Commander's Emergency Response Program (CERP) up to $25,000 per project. PRTs in Afghanistan may also coordinate with other U.S.-funded programs, including other commanders' CERP projects and USAID programs, such as the Local Governance and Community Development project. In Iraq, as of August 2008, the United States was leading 28 of 31 PRTs and other coalition countries were leading 3 PRTs. As of August 2008, three types of U.S.-led PRTs were operating in Iraq: 11 PRTs at the provincial level of government; 13 ePRTs embedded with U.S. brigade combat teams and operating in local governments in Baghdad, Anbar, Babil, and Diyala provinces; and 4 Provincial Support Teams (PST), which are smaller PRTs that cannot be based in the intended province due to security concerns. According to State and DOD officials, the number of personnel assigned to PRTs and ePRTs in Iraq increased from an estimated 100 to 125 personnel in early 2007 to about 450 in July 2008. This increase was the result of the Administration's decision in January 2007 to create ePRTs and to increase the size of PRTs in support of The New Way Forward. DOD and civilian agencies have staffed the PRTs with a mix of U.S. government employees--permanent and temporary--and contractors. State reimburses DOD for some operating costs of ePRTs and most PRTs, based on a quarterly estimate for each PRT member. State's reimbursements do not cover the costs of PRT security and transportation provided by the U.S. military. According to DOD, as of April 2008, State had reimbursed $11 million to DOD for operating costs--$5.9 million for fiscal year 2007 and $5.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. State had also obligated $125 million for PRT movement security from September 2005 through May 2008 for PRTs in Iraq that are not embedded with U.S. military units or do not have access to military movement assets.
    [Read More…]
  • Wisconsin-Based Nonprofit To Pay $1.9 Million To Settle Allegations Of False Claims And Kickbacks On Federal Contracts For Blind Workers
    In Crime News
    Industries for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc. (IBI) has agreed to pay the United States $1,938,684.09 to resolve allegations that IBI violated the False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Act in connection with certain federal contracts set aside to employ blind workers, the Justice Department announced today. 
    [Read More…]
  • Woman First in the Nation Charged with Misappropriating Monies Designed for COVID Medical Provider Relief
    In Crime News
    A Michigan woman was indicted on allegations that she intentionally misappropriated government funds that were designed to aid medical providers in the treatment of patients suffering from COVID-19 and used them for her own personal expenses.
    [Read More…]
  • Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprise Development: USAID Needs to Develop a Targeting Process and Improve the Reliability of Its Monitoring
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found For fiscal years 2015 through 2020, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) generally planned to spend at least $265 million annually on micro, small, and medium-sized enterprise (MSME) assistance, according to annual reports to Congress known as Section 653(a) reports. We found that planned spending amounts for MSME assistance in operational plans differed from the spending plans in the Section 653(a) reports, with the total planned spending exceeding the annual Section 653(a) report levels. USAID has not developed a process to support compliance with statutory requirements to target MSME resources to activities that reach the very poor and to small and medium-sized enterprise resources to activities that reach enterprises owned, managed, and controlled by women. We identified three key gaps that impair USAID's ability to develop such a process. First, USAID has not identified the total funding subject to the targeting requirements. Second, although USAID has programs designed to help the very poor, it is unable to determine the amount of funding that reaches this group. Third, although USAID has MSME activities that benefit women, it has not defined enterprises owned, managed, and controlled by women and does not collect data by enterprise size. These gaps leave USAID unable to determine what percentage of its MSME resources is going to the very poor and enterprises owned, managed, and controlled by women. USAID-Funded Small Enterprise Activities in Georgia, Afghanistan, and Ghana USAID collected and reported incomplete and inconsistent data in its process for monitoring MSME assistance. USAID surveys its missions and bureaus annually to collect data on the amounts and results of MSME assistance. However, USAID collected and reported incomplete data on its MSME assistance in fiscal year 2019, the year of the most recent report. It did not send the survey to all relevant missions and bureaus, and fewer than half of those that received the survey responded. Moreover, USAID's fiscal year 2019 reporting on assistance that reached the very poor included activities from only three of 21 missions that responded to its survey. USAID guidance states that its data should clearly and adequately represent the intended result. Without complete and consistent data, USAID cannot ensure that it is reporting accurate information to Congress on its MSME assistance. Why GAO Did This Study Millions of poor families throughout the developing world derive income from MSME activities. For decades, USAID has sought to use MSME assistance as a tool to achieve economic growth and poverty reduction in low-income countries. To improve programs and activities relating to women's entrepreneurship and economic empowerment, Congress passed the Women's Entrepreneurship and Economic Empowerment (WEEE) Act of 2018. Congress included a provision in this statute for GAO to assess USAID's MSME assistance. This report examines (1) USAID's planned MSME assistance for fiscal years 2015–2020; (2) the extent to which USAID targeted its MSME assistance to women and the very poor and developed a targeting process that it uses to comply with statutory requirements; and (3) the extent to which USAID has an appropriate process for monitoring its MSME assistance. GAO analyzed USAID documents and planned spending levels and interviewed USAID officials in Washington, D.C., and at 10 missions in regions in which USAID operates.
    [Read More…]
  • Justice Department Files Suit Against Dallas, Texas, Towing Company for Unlawfully Selling Servicemember-Owned Vehicles
    In Crime News
    The Justice Department today filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas alleging that Dallas-based towing company United Tows LLC violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), by unlawfully auctioning off vehicles owned by SCRA-protected servicemembers. 
    [Read More…]
  • Army Working Capital Fund: Army Faces Challenges in Managing Working Capital Fund Cash Balance during Wartime Environment
    In U.S GAO News
    The Army Working Capital Fund (AWCF) collected over $16 billion for goods and services provided to customers in fiscal year 2009. Cash generated from sales is used by AWCF to cover its expenses such as paying employees. In light of the Army's changing role in the Middle East, GAO was asked to determine whether (1) AWCF's monthly cash balances fell within the Department of Defense's (DOD) cash requirements for fiscal years 2000 through 2009, (2) the cash transfers resulted in AWCF's monthly cash balances falling below the minimum amount required by DOD, and (3) the AWCF's projected monthly cash balances are expected to fall below DOD's minimum cash requirement for fiscal years 2010 and 2011 and actions the Army can take to manage those balances. To address these objectives, GAO (1) reviewed relevant DOD guidance, (2) obtained and analyzed AWCF budget and accounting reports containing cash information, and (3) interviewed DOD and Army officials.GAO analysis showed that the AWCF monthly cash balance fluctuated significantly between fiscal years 2000 and 2009 and exceeded the maximum cash requirement prescribed by DOD regulation for 94 out of 120 months. The fluctuations were due to differences between receipts and disbursements, including the (1) receipt of collections from AWCF operations, (2) appropriations received in support of the wars, (3) disbursements made to pay for AWCF expenses, and (4) transfers made to fund other Army requirements. The Army transferred $4.8 billion out of AWCF from fiscal years 2004 through 2009. Most of the transfers funded requirements of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, or military personnel costs. These transfers helped to reduce the cash balance, but also resulted in the AWCF cash falling below the minimum cash requirement for a 6-month period in fiscal year 2006. GAO analysis of the AWCF fiscal year 2011 budget and cash plan showed that the projected monthly cash balances for fiscal years 2010 and 2011 would exceed DOD's minimum cash requirement for 22 out of 24 months. While the Army does not expect a cash shortfall due primarily to an increase in military build-up activities in Afghanistan, a cash shortfall may occur if certain Army actions are not implemented and monitored effectively. These actions include (1) reducing AWCF obligations to less than the amount of inventory sold, (2) collecting funds from Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) for inventory items transferred from AWCF to DLA, and (3) reducing the amount of inventory at industrial operations activities. Further, the relevant DOD Financial Management Regulation lacks sufficient clarity to determine the appropriate level of inventory to be held at these activities.
    [Read More…]
  • Cabo Verde Travel Advisory
    In Travel
    Reconsider travel to [Read More…]
Network News © 2005 Area.Control.Network™ All rights reserved.