October 26, 2021


News Network

At the Virtual Launch of the Inaugural U.S.-UAE Strategic Dialogue

20 min read

Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State

Washington, D.C.

MR LENDERKING: Good evening to those in Abu Dhabi, and good morning to those in Washington, D.C. Welcome to the virtual launch of the U.S.-UAE Strategic Dialogue and the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding.

We are pleased to be joined by His Highness Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the United Arab Emirates; His Excellency Dr. Thani bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi, Minister of State for Foreign Trade of the United Arab Emirates; His Excellency Mohammed bin Ahmed Al Bawardi, Minister of State for Defense Affairs of the United Arab Emirates; His Excellency Dr. Anwar bin Mohammed Gargash, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates; His Excellency Yousef Al Otaiba, Ambassador of the United Arab Emirates to the United States of America; the Honorable Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State, the United States of America; the Honorable Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce of the United States of America; the Honorable John Rakolta Jr., Ambassador of the United States of America to the United Arab Emirates.

Our program will begin with brief remarks from Secretary Pompeo, Minister bin Zayed, Secretary Ross, and Minister of State Al Zeyoudi. This will be followed by the signing of the U.S.-UAE Strategic Dialogue Memorandum of Understanding.

And now, please allow me to invite Secretary Pompeo to deliver his remarks.

SECRETARY POMPEO: Thank you, Tim. Good morning, everyone. Good evening. Welcome to this launch of the first inaugural U.S.-UAE Strategic Dialogue. It’s a historic day, an important day, and it’s a great pleasure to be joined by my friends, Your Highness, my friend, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed, Your Excellencies, Ministers Zeyoudi, Bawardi, Gargash, and Ambassador Otaiba. Wilbur, John, Secretary Ross, Ambassador Rakolta, it’s great to be with you, too. Thanks for joining us. I regret so much that we can’t be here in person doing this alongside of each other. One day, before too long, we’ll do that.

During the Trump administration, the United States and the United Arab Emirates relationship has grown deeper and broader than at any point before. I think having this dialogue is evidence of that.

Sheikh Abdullah, we last saw each other at the White House for the signing ceremony of the Abraham Accords with Israel.

It was a brave step that will create more opportunities for peace, prosperity, and stability in the Middle East and all around the world.

In your meeting with President Trump that day, you described the UAE as a nation “full of hope” that “wants to attract more hope to the region.” So beautiful.

Today’s MOU will build on those hopes in eight key areas of partnership: politics, defense, law enforcement and border security, intelligence and counterterrorism, human rights, economics, cultural – culture and academics, and space.

I am confident that the United States and the UAE’s strategic partnership across every one of these dimensions will grow in the years to come.

The Trump administration prioritizes this relationship so highly because our two peoples have demonstrated how much we can accomplish together – not just talk, but action.

We’ve worked alongside one another towards peace in many countries in the Middle East.

The UAE too is a top investor here in America. And you’re our number-one export destination in the Middle East as well.

We both value the protection of religious freedoms and cooperate on human rights objectives, like ending human trafficking and empowering women to reach their God-given potential. I hope to see more of that in the future from the entire region.

We of course remain engaged on a number of regional issues, including healing the rifts among Arab Gulf partners and advancing the cause of peace in Libya and in Yemen.

And we stand together on the international stage to counter the greatest destructive force in the Middle East – the Iranian regime.

I want to personally thank the UAE for its support of our maximum pressure campaign, which has denied Tehran access to weapons valued at more than $70 billion.

We’re grateful, too, for your help to hold the regime accountable at the United Nations.

By working with us, the UAE has shown that you want the UN to do its job to hold – uphold peace and security in your region.

Look, in short, the UAE is an increasingly important global partner with the United States.

The world will see that again next year with Expo 2020 in Dubai, which had to be delayed just a bit.

For all those reasons – for all those reasons and more, this is one of America’s most valued relationships, and all of us here in the Trump administration look forward to discussing all this in person in Abu Dhabi soon as a follow-on to this launch today. We’ll continue to work on today’s challenges, including those presented by Iran, and new challenges like those presented by the Chinese Communist Party’s malign influence, which threatens the region’s people and freedom around the world. Let’s keep up our good work through the expo, through 2021, as the UAE celebrates 50 years of independence.

With that, I am happy and honored to turn it over to Sheikh Abdullah. Thank you for being with me today.

MR LENDERKING: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. I now have the pleasure to invite His Highness Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed to deliver his remarks.

FOREIGN MINISTER ABDULLAH BIN ZAYED: Dear friend and Secretary Pompeo, I’m honored to be here witnessing another historical day that joins us together, the UAE and the United States. As you mentioned, we’re not in person but virtually. It is a challenge, no doubt, with COVID, but it’s – it just shows how determined both of us, at both the UAE Government and the American administration, are working together and have been working together for so many years. You mentioned that the UAE will be celebrating its 50th anniversary, but we’ll also be celebrating our 50th anniversary of relationship between these two nations.

Not too long, I was honored to be at the White House lawn celebrating the Abrahamic Accord. Today, we see another important milestone in the relationship between the UAE and Israel. And frankly, if it wasn’t for the assistance of the Trump administration, your personal effort, dear Secretary, and your team, who’ve been so committed in working towards broader relationship with the UAE but also a broader relationship with the region to bring in the region hope, peace, and prosperity.

Nineteen years ago, dear Secretary, we decided the UAE to join the efforts of the United States in going after terror which occurred on 9/11. That’s not enough. The voices of extremism, radicalism is still gaining momentum. We saw that recently in Paris. And we have to double down our efforts together in overcoming these extreme radical voices. There’s no doubt in my mind that your administration and many countries around the world are willing and capable. We have to make sure that our effort succeeds.

Dear Secretary, almost a decade ago the UAE signed with the United States the 123 Agreement, which was considered then a gold standard. That gold standard is a blessing today. We look at the nuclear concern of all of us in Iran, and we believe that that nuclear gold standard should be applied on Iran as well. I hope that such a gold standard will remind us that this could be another moment of a gold standard, of a relationship between the UAE and the United States.

I’m sure that the efforts of Ambassador Rakolta, Dr. Gargash, and Yousef Al Otaiba and many more in the United States and the UAE who have been very much working in a joint, friendly spirit for a stronger UAE relationship with the United States. We would like to see more jobs created in the United States. We are proud that we provide over 120,000 jobs with our investments in the United States. The UAE is the largest export destination in the Middle East for the United States, and I’m sure with less barriers between us and more efforts and more good work, we can achieve much more.

So thank you, Secretary, and please convey my gratitude to your administration and your team in D.C.

MR LENDERKING: Thank you, Your Highness. Please allow me to invite Secretary Ross to deliver his remarks.

SECRETARY ROSS: Thank you, Timothy, for that introduction. Thank you also to my neighbor, Ambassador Rokolta, for organizing this event. And my thanks to Secretary Pompeo for your incredible leadership on last month’s peace agreement in the Mideast. The Abraham Accords have transformed Middle East dynamics and provided so many people with hope. Thank you for hosting today’s discussion.

A warm welcome also to His Excellencies Abdullah bin Zayed and Dr. Thani bin Ahmed Zeyoudi who join us this morning. I am pleased that today we can discuss expanding the commercial ties between our two nations. This dialogue is critical as we rise from the global COVID-19 challenges facing both of our nations. We are two of the most innovative and advanced economies in the world. And the UAE is our third-largest trading partner in the MENA region with more than $24 billion in two-way trade in 2019. U.S. foreign direct investment in UAE was 27.6 billion last year, up 2.7 billion since 2016. And Emeriti FDI into the United States increased from 13.7 billion in 2016 to 17.1 billion last year.

While the current COVID crisis is still affecting the global trade system, I am encouraged by your nations efforts to diversify your economy. The government’s recent reorganization enables you to become more agile and to prepare for expansion into advanced manufacturing, renewable energy, and commercial space, plus providing innovative solutions to food security.

The UAE’s work in improving its intellectual property rights environment is also reassuring. Unfortunately, your country is in its third year of appearing on the USTR’s Special 301 Report Watchlist for not providing adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights. However, your recent passage of the new pharmaceutical IEP regulation is a leap in the right direction and could make UAE the best and safest place in the Mideast to bring innovative pharmaceutical and biotech investment in technology.

My department is eager to have the U.S. Patent and Trade Office provide you with any technical assistance you might need to further refine your IPR practices. And my department’s International Trade Administration is looking forward to our upcoming data privacy technical workshops with the UAE in December.

U.S. companies have expressed concern about data localization efforts in the UAE. It cannot be overstated that adopting a data privacy framework based upon existing global models and best practices is critical to economic recovery and advancement. During the workshops, there will be discussions on data-flow regulations and a potential regional data framework. And in March next year, ITA’s global market’s team will host a two-day infrastructure roadshow in Abu Dhabi.

The first day’s infrastructure conference will enable UAE and regional government officials to present to an audience of U.S. companies and officials their upcoming major projects, such as smart cities, energy, and infrastructure, and highlight how U.S. companies can get more involved. The second day’s infrastructure summit will bring UAE and U.S. Government officials together to discuss how they can strategically support increased participation of UAE’s companies and UAE infrastructure projects.

These engagements will also offer great opportunities to engage on multiple advocacy cases across the Gulf. Within ITA, the Advocacy Center is currently assisting U.S. companies with 42 procurement cases in the UAE. The cumulative total project value of these approximates $10 billion, with 8.1 billion of U.S. content. The principal industries covered are aerospace and defense, safety and security, and energy.

Since 2016, the Advocacy Group has recorded seven project wins in the UAE with a total value of $2.3 billion. I encourage all of you here today to participate in both of these infrastructure events next spring. I also hope to welcome a delegation from UAE once more to the 2021 SelectUSA Investment Summit taking place June 6 to the 9th, 2021, here in Washington. This event provides a unique opportunity for Emirati business executives to meet with economic development organizations from across the United States.

Finally, I commend the UAE for hosting and organizing the upcoming World Expo in Dubai. Our U.S. Commercial Service will engage the U.S. business community in the Expo’s U.S. pavilion and will join you to celebrate the Expo’s conclusion in March 2022 by bringing our flagship Trade Winds Team Mission with over 100 U.S. companies to the UAE to explore export and trade opportunities. Meanwhile, the U.S. mission there is ready and willing to assist you in any way we can.

Before I close, I’m pleased to announce that the Department of Commerce is working to conclude two MOUs of understanding with Emirati Government agencies. One will be on exchanging best practices for promoting foreign direct investment and the other will be on promoting innovation and entrepreneurship. These MOUs will support the broader goals of the Strategic Dialogue and specifically address the focus areas of the economic, energy, and commercial partnership subcommittee.

Furthermore, we will announce soon our second digital attache who will cover digital trade issues and will be based in the UAE. I look forward to today’s discussion and to deepening our nations’ close relationship in the years to come. Thank you.

MR LENDERKING: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. I now have the pleasure to invite Minister of State Al Zeyoudi to deliver his remarks.

STATE MINISTER AL ZEYOUDI: Thank you, Timothy. Good morning and good afternoon, everyone. It’s really an honor to be with my esteemed colleagues today of the start of the U.S.-UAE Strategic Dialogue. Let me as well thank His Highness Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed as well as his counterpart, Secretary Pompeo, for initiating this dialogue, as well as the Ambassador Al Otaiba and Rakolta for their ongoing support.

As you all know, the world is facing very challenging times, which makes today’s dialogue of great importance for the continued success of our bilateral relationship. Let me offer a few thoughts about the economic and trade relationship, some of the key areas that I think we can grow in the coming year.

For 11 years, the UAE has been the top U.S. export destination in the Middle East. In 2019, the U.S. enjoyed $15.7 billion U.S. trade surplus with the UAE, the U.S. third-largest trade surplus globally. This trade led to growth for U.S. businesses and supported 167,000 American jobs. As His Highness noted, the UAE is significant – number seven the U.S. direct investment under areas such as technology, infrastructure, health care, renewable energy, and chemicals, which are deepening our economic cooperation.

The UAE’s diverse and expanding unlimited (inaudible) economy, also created more collaboration, drives economic prosperity, as well as cultivates business opportunities. Of course, our Strategic Dialogue comes at a moment of great uncertainty with respect to the – both public health and global economy. We must be realistic in the face of the current global economic shut – downturn. Projection for the economic contraction will, of course, impact our trade bargain here and perhaps next year as well.

But during these challenging times, the UAE economy remains resilient with far-sighted leadership, deep financial resources, and global engagement (inaudible). The UAE knows how to put down (inaudible) to prosper in difficult condition, and the U.S. will, too.

I’m confident that the bilateral economic relationship will overcome the shock of the pandemic and continue to thrive. We are already seeing this in the way that the U.S. and the UAE partners have responded to the crisis – inventive ways. For example, the UAE’s Mubadala and its subsidiary, Strata Manufacturing, collaborated with Honeywell to develop N95 masks. Partnership sought to address the global need for personal protection equipment that many governments and organizations have struggled with since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak.

We here and the Ministry of Economy can assure you that the UAE’s leadership is energetic about finding new areas to expand trade and investment all around the world, and especially with the U.S. This is why we at the Ministry of Economy are working closely together to engage with our partners and develop new approaches to global economic development. No partner is more important than the United States, and we know there is much to explore.

Let me just as well highlight and address the issue with respect to the 2019 Special 301 Report. The UAE has made significant progress in regards to the patent protection, destruction of counterfeit goods, and creation of a collective management society. We do hope that the recent shared trust of the UAE action plan with the U.S. side can act as a firm basis for constructive discussion between both sides. And I can assure you that there is a high-level resolve within the UAE Government to be removed from the USTR 301 Special Report and the intellectual property rights watch list.

Given the current economic challenges facing the world today, it’s even more crucial that we use this dialogue to work through hurdles and ensure a clear pathway to growth and mutual prosperity between our two countries. I’m confident that together, we’ve now further strengthened our economic partnership and help to lead the global restart and recovery. Thank you.

MR LENDERKING: Thank you, Mr. Minister. And now, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates Dr. Anwar Gargash, and Ambassador of the United States of America to the United Arab Emirates John Rakolta Jr., will sign and exchange the Memorandum of Understanding.

(The agreement was signed.)

MR LENDERKING: This Memorandum of Understanding memorializes that we are establishing a Strategic Dialogue between the United Arab Emirates and the United States as a forum for open, productive engagement and cooperation. This initiative recognizes the enduring partnership and common vision that we share for a secure, stable, and prosperous Middle East.

With the establishment of the Strategic Dialogue, we acknowledge the benefits of regular and robust engagement to exchange views and deepen our cooperation on areas of mutual interest.

(The agreement was signed.)

MR LENDERKING: Thank you, Secretary Pompeo, Minister bin Zayed, Secretary Ross, Minister of State Al Zeyoudi, Minister of State Al Bawardi, Minister of State Gargash, Ambassador Rakolta, and Ambassador Otaiba.

This concludes the virtual launch of the U.S.-UAE Strategic Dialogue. Thank you, everyone, for joining.

News Network

  • Statement from Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband Commemorating the Twentieth Anniversary of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act
    In Crime News
    Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Eric Dreiband issued the following statement today commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act:
    [Read More…]
  • Shipping Company Fined $2 Million in a Multi-District Case for Concealing Illegal Discharges of Oily Water into the Atlantic Ocean
    In Crime News
    Diana Wilhelmsen Management Limited (DWM), a Cyprus-based company that operates several commercial vessels, was sentenced today in federal court before U.S. District Court Judge Rebecca Beach Smith in Norfolk, Virginia, after pleading guilty to violations of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships that had occurred on the Motor Vessel (M/V) Protefs.
    [Read More…]
  • Trinidad and Tobago Travel Advisory
    In Travel
    Reconsider travel [Read More…]
  • Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Lotfullah Najafizada of TOLO News
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Fiji National Day
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
  • DOD Acquisition Outcomes: A Case for Change
    In U.S GAO News
    The Department of Defense (DOD) is shepherding a portfolio of major weapon systems valued at about $1.3 trillion. How DOD is managing this investment has been a matter of concern for some time. Since 1990, GAO has designated DOD's weapon system acquisitions as a high-risk area for fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. DOD has experienced cost overruns, missed deadlines, performance shortfalls, and persistent management problems. In light of the serious budget pressures facing the nation, such problems are especially troubling. GAO has issued hundreds of reports addressing broad-based issues, such as best practices, as well as reports focusing on individual acquisitions. These reports have included many recommendations. Congress asked GAO to testify on possible problems with and improvements to defense acquisition policy. In doing so, we highlight the risks of conducting business as usual and identify some of the solutions we have found in successful acquisition programs and organizations.DOD is facing a cascading number of problems in managing its acquisitions. Cost increases incurred while developing new weapon systems mean DOD cannot produce as many of those weapons as intended nor can it be relied on to deliver to the warfighter when promised. Military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq are consuming a large share of DOD resources and causing the department to invest more money sooner than expected to replace or fix existing weapons. Meanwhile, DOD is intent on transforming military operations and has its eye on multiple megasystems that are expected to be the most expensive and complex ever. These costly conditions are running head-on into the nation's unsustainable fiscal path. DOD knows what to do to achieve more successful outcomes but finds it difficult to apply the necessary discipline and controls or assign much-needed accountability. DOD has written into policy an approach that emphasizes attaining a certain level of knowledge at critical junctures before managers agree to invest more money in the next phase of weapon system development. This knowledge-based approach results in evolutionary--that is, incremental, manageable, predictable--development and inserts several controls to help managers gauge progress in meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals. But DOD is not employing the knowledge-based approach, discipline is lacking, and business cases are weak. Persistent practices show a decided lack of restraint. DOD's requirements process generates more demand for new programs than fiscal resources can support. DOD compounds the problem by approving so many highly complex and interdependent programs. Once too many programs are approved to start, the budgeting process exacerbates problems. Because programs are funded annually and departmentwide, cross-portfolio priorities have not been established, competition for funding continues over time, forcing programs to view success as the ability to secure the next funding increment rather than delivering capabilities when and as promised. Improving this condition requires discipline in the requirements and budgetary processes. Determining who should be held accountable for deviations and what penalties are needed is crucial. If DOD cannot discipline itself now to execute programs within fiscal realities, then draconian, budget-driven decisions may have to be made later.
    [Read More…]
  • Warfighter Support: Independent Expert Assessment of Army Body Armor Test Results and Procedures Needed Before Fielding
    In U.S GAO News
    The Army has issued soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan personal body armor, comprising an outer protective vest and ceramic plate inserts. GAO observed Preliminary Design Model testing of new plate designs, which resulted in the Army's awarding contracts in September 2008 valued at a total of over $8 billion to vendors of the designs that passed that testing. Between November and December 2008, the Army conducted further testing, called First Article Testing, on these designs. GAO is reporting on the degree to which the Army followed its established testing protocols during these two tests. GAO did not provide an expert ballistics evaluation of the results of testing. GAO, using a structured, GAO-developed data collection instrument, observed both tests at the Army's Aberdeen Test Center, analyzed data, and interviewed agency and industry officials to evaluate observed deviations from testing protocols. However, independent ballistics testing expertise is needed to determine the full effect of these deviations.During Preliminary Design Model testing the Army took significant steps to run a controlled test and maintain consistency throughout the process, but the Army did not always follow established testing protocols and, as a result, did not achieve its intended test objective of determining as a basis for awarding contracts which designs met performance requirements. In the most consequential of the Army's deviations from testing protocols, the Army testers incorrectly measured the amount of force absorbed by the plate designs by measuring back-face deformation in the clay backing at the point of aim rather than at the deepest point of depression. Army testers recognized the error after completing about a third of the test and then changed the test plan to call for measuring at the point of aim and likewise issued a modification to the contract solicitation. At least two of the eight designs that passed Preliminary Design Model testing and were awarded contracts would have failed if measurements had been made to the deepest point of depression. The deviations from the testing protocols were the result of Aberdeen Test Center's incorrectly interpreting the testing protocols. In all these cases of deviations from the testing protocols, the Aberdeen Test Center's implemented procedures were not reviewed or approved by the Army and Department of Defense officials responsible for approving the testing protocols. After concerns were raised regarding the Preliminary Design Model testing, the decision was made not to field any of the plate designs awarded contracts until after First Article Testing was conducted. During First Article Testing, the Army addressed some of the problems identified during Preliminary Design Model testing, but GAO observed instances in which Army testers did not follow the established testing protocols and did not maintain internal controls over the integrity and reliability of data, raising questions as to whether the Army met its First Article Test objective of determining whether each of the contracted designs met performance requirements. The following are examples of deviations from testing protocols and other issues that GAO observed: (1) The clay backing placed behind the plates during ballistics testing was not always calibrated in accordance with testing protocols and was exposed to rain on one day, potentially impacting test results. (2) Testers improperly rounded down back-face deformation measurements, which is not authorized in the established testing protocols and which resulted in two designs passing First Article Testing that otherwise would have failed. Army officials said rounding is a common practice; however, one private test facility that rounds told GAO that they round up, not down. (3) Testers used a new instrument to measure back-face deformation without adequately certifying that the instrument could function correctly and in conformance with established testing protocols. The impact of this issue on test results is uncertain, but it could call into question the reliability and accuracy of the measurements. (4) Testers deviated from the established testing protocols in one instance by improperly scoring a complete penetration as a partial penetration. As a result, one design passed First Article Testing that would have otherwise failed. With respect to internal control issues, the Army did not consistently maintain adequate internal controls to ensure the integrity and reliability of test data. In one example, during ballistic testing, data were lost, and testing had to be repeated because an official accidentally pressed the delete button and software controls were not in place to protect the integrity of test data. Army officials acknowledged that before GAO's review they were unaware of the specific internal control problems we identified.
    [Read More…]
  • Child Welfare: Better Data and Guidance Could Help States Reinvest Adoption Savings and Improve Federal Oversight
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found From fiscal years 2015 through 2019, states collectively reinvested $516 million of the $843 million they accrued in “adoption savings” (see figure). Adoption savings are state funds saved due to the increasing number of children eligible for federal adoption assistance payments. States spent $224 million of these savings on post-adoption or post-guardianship (“post-permanency”) services, $67 million on services for youth at risk of entering foster care (“preventative services”), and $225 million on other child welfare services. States' individual spending varied widely. For example, 10 states spent all of their adoption savings, but 23 spent less than half, and nine of those spent none. Spent and Unspent State Adoption Savings, Fiscal Years 2015 through 2019 The Children's Bureau—part of the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Administration for Children and Families (ACF)—monitors states' adoption savings reinvestment, but its oversight is hindered by a lack of detailed data. Further, there is no statutory deadline for states to spend their savings, and Children's Bureau officials said states can delay their spending indefinitely. Also, the state data the Children's Bureau collects annually does not always allow it to definitively determine states' compliance with the requirement to spend at least 30 percent of their annual adoption savings on post-permanency and preventative services, including at least 20 percent on post-permanency services (the 20 and 30 percent requirements). If states do not reinvest their adoption savings or meet the 20 and 30 percent requirements, children will not benefit from the additional spending as intended by the law. Nearly half (23 of 52) of the states reported in GAO's survey at least one significant challenge to reinvesting their adoption savings, most often citing early spending difficulties such as needing time to understand the new requirements and competing state budget priorities. Most of the 28 states that received technical assistance from the Children's Bureau in fiscal year 2019 reported it was helpful, but 22 states wanted more assistance. Of those, 13 wanted more guidance on allowable adoption savings expenditures and/or other states' best practices and strategies for spending their savings. Further, 10 of these states had not yet spent 30 percent of their cumulative savings on required services. Without additional guidance or technical assistance, states may have difficulty meeting the 20 and 30 percent requirements or reinvesting their savings overall. Why GAO Did This Study The Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 expanded eligibility for federal adoption assistance and required states to reinvest any resulting adoption savings in their child welfare systems. The Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act required states to spend a minimum percentage of these savings on specific types of services starting in fiscal year 2015. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 included a provision for GAO to study states' adoption savings reinvestment. This report examines (1) the extent to which states are reinvesting their adoption savings, (2) how the Children's Bureau monitors these reinvestments, and (3) any challenges states face in reinvesting savings and what guidance the Children's Bureau provides. GAO analyzed state adoption savings and spending data for fiscal years 2015 through 2019, all available years of data at the time of this review. GAO surveyed 53 state child welfare agencies and 52 completed the survey. GAO also interviewed child welfare officials in eight states selected to provide variation in several areas, including the percent of adoption savings they had reinvested.
    [Read More…]
  • Woman Pleads Guilty to Accessing and Releasing Sensitive, Non-public Information
    In Crime News
    More from: February 4, [Read More…]
  • Congratulations to Bolivia’s President-Elect Luis Arce
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
  • Announcement of Transition in Leadership on Afghanistan Diplomacy
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Zoohackathon 2019: Combating Wildlife Trafficking Through Innovation and Technology
    In Climate - Environment - Conservation
    Office of the [Read More…]
  • Eritrea Travel Advisory
    In Travel
    Reconsider travel to [Read More…]
  • Secretary Blinken to Deliver a Foreign Policy Speech
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Office of the [Read More…]
  • Arrest of Eight Pan-Democratic Politicians in Hong Kong
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Michael R. Pompeo, [Read More…]
  • The Justice Department Announces Statement of Interest Filed in Lawsuit Challenging Philadelphia’s Moratorium that Cancelled the Veterans Day Parade
    In Crime News
    The Justice Department announced that a Statement of Interest (SOI) was filed today in a case pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that challenges the City of Philadelphia’s “Event Moratorium” that prohibits issuing permits for gatherings of 150 or more people on public property.
    [Read More…]
  • Secretary Antony J. Blinken Meet and Greet with U.S Mission France Staff
    In Crime Control and Security News
    Antony J. Blinken, [Read More…]
  • Public Transportation: Identifying Lessons Learned Could Help Improve FTA’s Process to Manage Safety Risks
    In U.S GAO News
    What GAO Found Of the twelve selected transit agencies GAO spoke with, most faced challenges incorporating the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) requirements to develop and document its Safety Management Systems (SMS) in their new agency safety plans. SMS is a performance-based, data-driven framework to manage safety risks throughout an organization. Some rail transit agencies noted difficulties transitioning from the former 21-element safety plan to SMS and its four required components. However, most transit agencies said they benefited from FTA's assistance. FTA's assistance included guidance documents, webinars, and training. Upon request, FTA also reviewed transit agencies' draft safety plans, providing lessons learned from those reviews. FTA established a Safety Risk Management (SRM) process to identify, assess, and mitigate safety risks across the nation's transit agencies. During the initial implementation, FTA selected four safety concerns to review (see fig. below). According to FTA, the use of cameras on rail transit was a pilot project, and FTA has completed four of the five steps in its process for the camera safety pilot. Though FTA continues to evaluate that pilot and work on the other three safety concerns, it has not completed actions to prepare for future rounds of the SRM process. In particular, FTA has not identified and documented lessons learned from the pilot. Documenting and incorporating such lessons could enhance the effectiveness and timeliness of FTA's SRM process and thus FTA's ability to address transit-wide safety risks. GAO's Assessment of the Status of the Safety Risk Management (SRM) Process for Four Safety Issues under Review by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) FTA continues to gather information while it considers whether to mandate certain transit safety standards. FTA has issued safety bulletins for rail cameras and end-of-railcar signage. These bulletins suggest but do not require certain actions related to the installation of cameras and signage in rail transit cars. FTA, however, has not yet initiated a rulemaking for any mandatory federal safety standards. While the diverse nature of the transit industry can make setting federal safety standards challenging, transit agencies GAO spoke with were generally open to mandatory safety standards for some safety issues. For example, many of the selected transit agencies expressed support for requiring medical examinations of employees, as well as other so-called human-factor safety risks. Why GAO Did This Study In recent years, new laws gave the Department of Transportation's FTA additional requirements and authorities to oversee transit safety. In turn, FTA now requires, among other things, transit agencies to develop new safety plans that incorporate SMS to manage and mitigate safety risk. FTA also incorporated SMS in its transit agency oversight to better identify and assess safety risks, and determine appropriate mitigation efforts, including mandatory safety standards. GAO was asked to examine how FTA is implementing its new responsibilities and authorities. This report examines (1) selected transit agencies' experiences in incorporating SMS in their new safety plans; (2) steps FTA is taking to identify, assess, and mitigate safety risks; and (3) FTA's status on mandating safety standards and stakeholders' views on the benefits and challenges of such standards. GAO reviewed FTA documents on safety oversight policies and practices and interviewed officials from 12 transit agencies and their 9 respective state oversight agencies. GAO selected transit agencies to reflect a variety of modes, sizes, age, and geographic diversity.
    [Read More…]
  • District Court Orders Washington State Company and its Owner to Stop Distributing Adulterated Juice Products
    In Crime News
    A federal court permanently enjoined a Sunnyside, Washington, company from preparing, processing, and distributing adulterated juice and other food products, the Department of Justice announced today.
    [Read More…]
  • Germany Travel Advisory
    In Travel
    Reconsider travel to [Read More…]
Network News © 2005 Area.Control.Network™ All rights reserved.